Month: June 2014

Today we know that areas of knowledge exist various, some are sciences, others not. 2.A border between Science and History Ciro Flamarion 2 Cardoso, as historian of world-wide reputation, always creates historiogrficos quarrels and debates, therefore it has produced books and articles that facilitate these quarrels. In its text ' ' Will be History a Science? ' ' , a quarrel starts that involves History, its theories and its methods, displaying of a clear form the questioning on the problem of the cientificidade of History, and pointing interesting examples as of the Mathematics, that are a science, where if it can prove everything with absolute certainty, whereas other sciences, called factual, can be counterfeited. In this context always valley to destine a more considerate look its theoretical production and to reflect the light of its conclusions. Not losing of sight the complexity of the subject, one time that the cientificidade of History is contested by many.

The intention is not here to carry through a deeper quarrel on the subject in question, this boarding has for limit the following purpose: to briefly characterize some aspects that in the perspective of the student of History, the question ' ' Will be History a science? ' ' , and to point the conclusions most current. Making comparisons between the biologist and the historian, we can observe the following one: the historian cannot predict the future, cannot explain the past, but only interpret it. does not have a decisive form to put to the test its alternative interpretations, whereas the biologist, however even so cannot foresee the evolution future and explain the passed one (he only can interpret), has certain advantages on the historian, as for example: to put the test its discoveries. However, Ciro Flamarion Cardoso shows its conclusion, ' ' To weigh of such advantages for the specialist in biological evolution, it continues being truth that does not exist comparable laws of the evolution to the laws of the Physics, accurately as it does not have laws of History.

Uncategorized

When objects of collateral assets, were not related to professional or business activity of the debtor or a production unit of ownership or not necessary for the continuity of this activity, not will be affected by the bankruptcy Declaration. In no event shall the stay of execution in the competition of creditors of individuals, since the lack of business or professional activity prevents the concurrence of the requirement of the condition. Once you’ve spent a year without the adoption of any Convention or open the liquidation, may resume suspended executions and start which have not done so before the bankruptcy Declaration, although the judge competent to hear the case will be the own bankruptcy judge. Open once the liquidation phase shall terminate the ability to run separately for those creditors who had not initiated proceedings before the Declaration of bankruptcy and will resume those executions which had been suspended by virtue of the above, although as a piece separated within the bankruptcy proceedings. Should also be borne in mind that the Declaration of bankruptcy does not affect the execution of guarantees regarding the debtor holds third holder of those condition. On the interpretation of this provision of the bankruptcy law is very interesting analysis which is done in the resolution of 6 June 2009 (BOE of 20 of July of 2009) the General Directorate of the registries and notaries, in an appeal lodged against the refusal of the property Registrar from issuing a certificate of ownership and charges in a procedure for direct execution on property mortgaged. A procedure for direct execution on mortgaged property, orders the issuing of certificate of ownership and charges resulting from the 656 of the LEC and the practice of the marginal note provided for in article 659 of the LEC.

Uncategorized