Embarrassing, stranger and by its very nature worthy situation of shame are, leaving of the estimated one of that the result of this modest analysis is true in such a way how much they can be the premise under which it is based, to laugh at itself; to exactly laugh at the meaning rank for us; to find favour not of what we interpret, but of the proper interpretation, made in compliance with it to awake the laugh. We laugh and in we feel them constrangidos, glad, happy and even though sad for what we see, we mentally do not feel and we hear but for what we think to see, to feel and to hear, making to coincide the nature of the thing perceived 9 and the semantics of the done judgment. We see the joke as soon as never had its favour; That the death never was sad and nor the least the dismal appearance is dressed with all that afflicted in them. It is not deplorable being alone, nor is more beautiful the company. Credit: Leo Schachter Diamonds-2011. My tear is my effect inasmuch as it is of it that I am cause. River of me exactly; I have fear of me; already does not have in the world man who, while man, never takes for inheritance the doubt to only have lived, to the side of an object whose life was not more than what only estimated. The ironic one now is not more to laugh at itself, before, however, if of agreed to the considered one, to have searched for this, attempted against it the precise meaning of each verb and still thus to have read only proper itself. If the direction is you who granted; the object, you who chose 10, the author of this world is you..
The most controversial points to be argued: public financing of the campaigns, district vote and vote in list. They would be thus, established criteria that would finish with the improper use them public mounts of money in the campaigns politics, preventing to a large extent the possibility of corrupes. The vote in list would be the voting in the party and not in the candidate. It is defended by many as a form to strengthen the partisan structure. The district vote would allow a bigger control on the part of the voters, in relation to its public representatives. It has a requirement of the society, for ready application of the Law of the Clean Fiche, through which honest individuals could only candidatar themselves. Until then, it was not obtained. It interests who? The release of the propaganda politics, with gratuitous access to the radio and television, with diffusion of unrealizable promises, is sorvidas by a devoid people in search of a paternalism, that supplies its necessities.
Today, unbeliever. He fits to the National Congress, to approve the necessary reform. Emendations constitutional would be necessary, objectifying to the revision of the living electoral laws. However, the only emendation carried through so far, was of the implantation of the re-election for plus a mandate, favoring the ambition of the continuity in the power. Defenders of the idea also exist to diminish the great amount of political parties, aiming at to a bigger structural control of the clubs, preventing the spraying of partisan entities, that do not possess an ideology well definite e, confuse the voter. We cannot guarantee that it would be the solution for all the problems, but I have the certainty of that it is the attempt most reasonable for a transparency bigger politics, in a country that clama for honesty and commitment with the citizenship. While the definitions demanded for the society are procrastinated, it goes if perpetuating the unreliability, the chaos of the health, the balbrdia in the education, a people orphan. Until when?